Op Ed: Burn Boot Camp is not a democracy
I’m beginning to suspect that Burn Boot Camp is not a democracy. When they say, “Makes sense? Say yes,” after explaining the exercise they expect you to perform, this is rhetorical. It is not a discussion point. In fact, the trainers launch into the exercise even if you respond, “I have no idea what you want me to do.”
Sure, you might build core strength and tone up a bit, but is that worth losing our democratic ideals? I propose that Burn Boot Camp adopt Robert’s Rules of Order. The trainer makes a motion to perform an exercise, and if there is no second, it fails. If there is a second, we all vote on whether or not we really want to do burpees into a backwards flip and then run a hundred miles. At least that is what it feels like the trainers are recommending.
Preceding each vote on whether or not we are performing the exercise, there would be a discussion of the pros and cons of performing that particular exercise. This way, the group can make an informed decision. This might reduce the number of exercises performed in a workout from six variations to maybe one if most of us feel like it.
These changes might reduce the effects of working out by adopting democratic principles, since most days I am a nay vote on anything more difficult than a pushup. In fact, you might actually gain weight because someone made a motion that rather than working out, we all just go out for doughnuts. The important thing is that we stop the appearance of authoritarian behavior.
